Updated: January 15, 2025- 11 min read
Time, effort, complexity — estimating tasks in Agile product management requires a bit of advanced planning. A system, rather.
Enter story points: a system that ditches the clock in favor of a more flexible, team-friendly approach to estimation. But what exactly are story points, and how do they stack up against the traditional hour-based method?
In this guide, we’ll break down what story points are, why they’re essential in Agile, and how to use them effectively for task estimation. Whether you’re a seasoned Scrum Master or just starting your Agile journey, this article has the answers you need.
User Story Templates
Our User Story Templates keep product development centered on real user needs and objectives. Available in 4 formats, they're easy to use whether you're planning a small feature or a full program!
Free download
What Are Story Points in Agile?
“As you grow, it comes down to ruthless prioritization. You have to say no to ten really good things to do two great things. It’s about figuring out what breaks through, and understanding that we all have the same amount of time. ”
— Vinod Suresh, US CPO at GoDaddy, on The Product Podcast
Story points — sometimes referred to as Sprint Points, Agile Points, or User Story Points — are the units of measure used in Agile to estimate the effort, complexity, and size of a task or user story. A user story is a short, simple description of a feature or task told from the perspective of the end user. They’re small chunks of work that need to be done, such as a button being added to a landing page or a minor feature being added to an onboarding flow.
The standard user story format is:
As a [type of user], I want to [task] so that I can [objective].
Unlike time-based estimation, story points focus on the relative scale of a task rather than the actual hours the task or feature related to the user story might take to complete. This approach accounts for multiple factors — such as the task's difficulty, the number of unknowns, and the risk involved. Therefore, they provide a more flexible and holistic view of the effort required.
Teams assign story points during sprint planning or backlog refinement sessions, sometimes even during Agile Retrospectives. A popular method for assigning story points is Planning Poker, where team members independently estimate a task's complexity using numbered cards, then discuss the estimates to reach a consensus. This collaborative approach not only ensures accuracy but also encourages discussion around task intricacies and potential blockers.
The key is to focus on relativity: a task that is "twice as complex" as another will receive roughly double the story points. Let’s see what we mean by this.
An Easy Example to Understand Agile Story Points
Let’s say your team is working on building a mobile app. You have three tasks to estimate using sprint story points:
Adding a button (1) is straightforward, requiring minimal effort — this task is assigned 1 story point.
Implementing the search feature (2) involves creating a search algorithm and connecting it to a database, which is more complex — this gets 5 story points.
Integrating payment processing (3) is highly complex, involves multiple unknowns, and carries significant risk, so the team assigns it 13 story points.
This system avoids the pitfalls of exact time-based estimates by focusing on relative sizing. While the actual time to complete each task may vary, the story points provide a shared understanding of their complexity and allow the team to plan effectively.
Why Agile Teams Use the Fibonacci Sequence for Story Points
In Agile, story points are often assigned using the Fibonacci sequence (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, etc.) because it helps teams handle uncertainty as task size increases. The gaps between numbers grow larger, reflecting the fact that bigger tasks are harder to estimate accurately.
For example, distinguishing between a 9-point task and a 10-point task on a simple 1-10 scale could feel arbitrary. The Fibonacci sequence avoids this problem by making those differences intentionally broader as tasks grow more complex.
This method encourages teams to think critically about whether a task is "a little harder" (e.g., 3 points) or "significantly harder" (e.g., 8 points). It’s a practical way to keep estimates realistic and consistent without over-complicating the process.
Benefits of Using Story Points in Agile
“A PM must rationalize: Are we shipping features that grow the business or just what customers ask for?”
— Stephen Hsu, CPO at Calendly, on The Product Podcast
Encourages Cross-Team Collaboration: Estimation with story points fosters team discussions, aligning everyone on the complexity and effort required for tasks.
Accounts for Complexity, Not Just Time: Story points capture not just the effort but also the risks, unknowns, and complexity of tasks, offering a more comprehensive estimation approach.
Removes Time Pressure: By decoupling estimates from hours, story points reduce the stress of adhering to time-specific deadlines.
Improves Long-Term Planning: Over time, teams develop a velocity (average story points completed per sprint), which aids in predicting how much work can be accomplished in future sprints.
Promotes Consistency: Relative sizing creates a standard framework for comparing tasks, reducing variability in estimates across different team members.
Adapts to Team Dynamics: Story points reflect the capacity and expertise of the current team rather than relying on industry averages or external benchmarks.
Simplifies Product Prioritization: Assigning story points helps prioritize work by highlighting tasks that are more complex or effort-intensive.
Encourages Focus on Value: Teams can focus on delivering high-value features rather than getting bogged down in exact time estimates.
Facilitates Incremental Improvement: By tracking completed story points, teams can identify patterns, improve processes, and enhance efficiency over time.
Supports Agile Flexibility: Story points align with Agile’s iterative and flexible nature, allowing teams to adapt as they learn more about the project.
Avoids Feeture Creeps: When tasks aren’t properly differentiated, and teams lack focus on what really matters, it’s known to lead to feature creeps.
Agile Story Points vs. Hour-Based Estimation
Agile teams often face the choice of estimating tasks using story points or hours. While both methods aim to plan and allocate work effectively, they differ significantly in approach, focus, and flexibility. Here’s how they compare:
1. Focus and Approach
Story Points: Measure relative effort, complexity, and uncertainty. The goal is to evaluate tasks in comparison to one another without focusing on exact timeframes.
Hours: Measure the actual time a task is expected to take. This approach requires team members to predict exact durations.
2. Accounting for Complexity
Story Points: Consider complexity, risk, and unknowns. For example, integrating a third-party API might have hidden complications, which can be reflected in higher story points.
Hours: Focus solely on time, often neglecting factors like difficulty or potential risks, leading to less comprehensive estimates.
3. Accuracy Over Time
Story Points: Over time, as the team refines its process, velocity (average story points completed per sprint) provides a consistent measure for planning, even with varying task complexities.
Hours: Time estimates can fluctuate significantly, especially when new or complex tasks are involved, leading to inaccurate predictions.
4. Team Dynamics
Story Points: Encourage collaboration and shared understanding. Estimation sessions promote discussions about what makes tasks complex, leading to collective buy-in.
Hours: Often rely on individual expertise, which can vary greatly between team members, potentially leading to inconsistent estimates.
5. Flexibility
Story Points: Allow for agility. Since they aren’t tied to actual time, they provide flexibility when task requirements evolve.
Hours: Tie tasks to rigid timeframes, making it harder to adapt when requirements change or new insights emerge.
6. Stress and Productivity
Story Points: Focus on relative sizing, reducing the stress of overly precise time commitments.
Hours: Create pressure to adhere to specific time expectations, potentially leading to burnout or rushed work.
Story Point Estimate vs. Hour-Based: Which Is Better?
Use story points if your team values flexibility, iterative improvement, and a focus on tackling complexity. They shine in environments where innovation or unpredictability is the norm—like when developing new features or exploring uncharted technical solutions. Story points let you focus on the big picture.
On the other hand, hours might be better suited if your stakeholders demand precise timelines or if you’re working on tasks that are repetitive, well-understood, and unlikely to deviate from the plan. Think of routine updates or maintenance tasks — these are easier to quantify in terms of time.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your team’s culture, project needs, and how experienced you are with Agile practices. For most Agile teams, though, story points strike a sweet spot. They combine accuracy with adaptability, letting you estimate without feeling locked into fixed deadlines.
How to Estimate Tasks Using Story Points: A Step-by-Step Guide
Estimating tasks with story points is essential for effective planning in Agile product management. This approach aligns closely with key product management practices, such as prioritization, cross-functional collaboration, and iterative delivery. Here’s how you can do it:
1. Establish a Baseline for Story Points
Start by creating a shared understanding within your team about what different story point values represent.
Choose a simple task as the baseline — something straightforward, like fixing a minor bug, can be assigned 1 story point. All other tasks are estimated relative to this baseline. This concept is similar to how product managers use weighted scoring models to evaluate feature value.
2. Break Down User Stories Into Manageable Tasks
Large, ambiguous tasks are harder to estimate and often lead to costly delays.
Collaborate with your team to break down complex user stories into smaller, actionable tasks. For example, instead of estimating "Build a payment feature," divide it into "Design payment flow," "Integrate payment gateway," and "Test payment functionality."
This mirrors the product management process of breaking down strategic goals into manageable deliverables.
3. Collaborate During Sprint Planning
Engage the entire team during sprint planning, creation of product roadmaps, or backlog refinement to assign story points.
Discuss each task’s complexity, effort, and potential risks. This cross-functional collaboration mirrors the product management practice of bringing diverse perspectives to decision-making. This is how you make sure all technical and design challenges are accounted for.
4. Use Relative Estimation to Assign Story Points
Compare tasks to each other rather than estimating them in isolation. For example, if designing a login screen feels twice as complex as fixing a bug (5 points), assign the login screen 8 points on a Fibonacci scale.
While story points focus on effort and complexity, you can layer prioritization frameworks like WSJF to ensure high-value tasks are tackled first. WSJF evaluates tasks based on their cost of delay and effort, making it ideal for balancing urgency and complexity. RICE, on the other hand, helps rank tasks by estimating their potential impact, reach, and confidence relative to the effort required.
Integrating these methodologies with story points can create a powerful prioritization system.
5. Track Story Points in Agile Tools
Use Proddy Awarded Tools like Monday or Linear to document and track story points. In Jira, also, you can add story points directly to issues. Keeping story points visible helps teams stay aligned and provides product managers with insights into task prioritization and sprint progress.
6. Monitor Team Velocity During Sprints
As sprints progress, measure your team’s velocity — the average number of story points completed per sprint. This data is invaluable for product managers planning future iterations and setting realistic delivery timelines.
7. Continuously Refine Your Estimation Process
After completing a few sprints, reflect on the accuracy of your story point estimates during retrospectives.
Were the complexities accurately captured?
Were there unexpected blockers?
Did time-to-finish match story point estimation?
Use these insights to recalibrate your baseline and improve estimation accuracy. This iterative improvement mirrors the product management process of fine-tuning strategies based on feedback and results.
The Story Point Advantage: Simplicity Sparks Action
Story points are as simple as they are effective. This makes them incredibly easy to test right away.
There’s no need for complex frameworks or lengthy preparations — just gather your team, pick a baseline, and start estimating. Their simplicity opens up space for experimentation, allowing you to see immediate results and refine as you go.
So, why overthink it? Try story points already in your next sprint — sometimes, the simplest tools are the ones that drive the biggest impact.
Design Sprint Template
Use design thinking to solve design problems and reduce production risks.
GET THE TEMPLATE
Updated: January 15, 2025
