Updated: February 3, 2025- 13 min read
Your product backlog is bursting at the seams with ideas, requests, and must-haves, each competing for attention. There is a gap between what you consider important and what the collective consensus seems to say. Sound familiar?
For product managers, product prioritization is a survival tool. Yet, traditional methods often fall short when the pressure’s on. Moreover, without the structured model of thinking, it’s hard to get everyone on the same page.
That’s where the Impact Effort Matrix comes in. This deceptively simple framework can turn the chaos of decision-making into clarity. It can help individuals and teams pinpoint what to pursue and what to leave on the cutting room floor.
In this article, we’ll explore how this Impact vs. Effort Matrix solves the toughest prioritization problems. We’ll take it step by step on how to create, implement, and maximize its benefits for your product team. By the end, you’ll not only understand the power of this tool — you’ll wonder how you ever managed without it. Let’s dive in.
Feature Prioritization Template
Use this feature prioritization template to get clear direction on which features to include and which to leave out.
Download Free
What Is the Impact Effort Matrix?
The Impact Effort Matrix is a simple yet powerful tool for prioritizing tasks, projects, or initiatives based on two key factors: impact and effort.
It helps product teams make informed decisions about where to focus their time, energy, and resources by visually categorizing work into four quadrants. Each quadrant represents a combination of high/low impact and high/low effort, making it easier to identify high-value, low-effort opportunities and deprioritize tasks that drain resources without significant returns.
How the impact vs. effort matrix works
The matrix is a two-dimensional grid where:
The X-axis represents effort: the amount of time, energy, or resources required to complete a task.
The Y-axis represents impact: the value or benefit the task delivers, such as revenue growth, user satisfaction, or operational efficiency.
Tasks are plotted on this grid based on their estimated effort and impact, creating four quadrants:
The four quadrants of the impact effort chart
Quick Wins (Low Effort, High Impact)
These are the high-value, low-effort tasks that can drive growth with minimal resource investment. Think of these as opportunities that deliver a big return quickly and with little risk. Prioritize these tasks as they often provide immediate wins for the team and stakeholders.Big Bets (High Effort, High Impact)
These initiatives require significant resources but have the potential to create transformative results. While their payoff can be substantial, they come with a higher risk. If the hypothesis behind a Big Bet fails, it can result in wasted development time. Careful planning and alignment with strategic goals are critical before committing to these projects.Fill-Ins (Low Effort, Low Impact)
These tasks don’t require much effort, but they also don’t deliver significant value. Fill-Ins are best reserved for downtime or periods when higher-priority tasks are blocked. Use them to maintain momentum without straining resources, but avoid letting them consume valuable time that could be spent on more impactful work.Money Pit (High Effort, Low Impact)
These are the tasks to avoid at all costs. They demand significant effort but provide little to no value in return, making them detrimental to morale and the bottom line. Identifying Money Pits early on allows teams to redirect resources to more promising initiatives.
Why the impact and effort matrix is useful
The Impact Effort Matrix simplifies decision-making by turning abstract priorities into a clear visual map. It fosters alignment across teams, reduces analysis paralysis, and prevents wasted effort on low-value tasks. For product managers, this framework is particularly valuable for:
Prioritizing feature requests
Balancing short-term wins with long-term goals
Think of the Impact Effort Matrix as a restaurant menu. High-impact, low-effort items are like appetizers: quick to prepare and satisfying. High-impact, high-effort items are like entrees: they take more time and resources but are the main attraction. Low-impact, low-effort items are like side dishes: they can complement the meal but aren't essential. Low-impact, high-effort items are like elaborate desserts: they might be impressive but may not be worth the effort. What’s more, the costly ingredients and specialized personnel they require might be a money pit.
By categorizing tasks in this way, you ensure every decision maximizes productivity and impact while keeping resources in check.
Benefits of Using the Impact Effort Matrix
Simplifies decision-making
The matrix provides a visual representation of tasks or projects, making it easier to evaluate their potential impact versus required effort. By categorizing tasks into four clear quadrants, teams can quickly identify what to prioritize, what to plan for, and what to avoid. This eliminates guesswork and streamlines the decision-making process, especially when faced with an overwhelming backlog, feature creeps, or competing priorities.Enhances focus on high-value work
One of the core benefits of the Impact Priority Matrix is its ability to highlight Quick Wins — tasks that deliver significant results with minimal effort. By focusing on these, teams can achieve impactful outcomes without overextending their resources. It also ensures that resources aren’t wasted on Money Pits (low impact, high effort tasks), keeping the team aligned on value.Promotes strategic resource allocation
Resources like time, money, and team capacity are limited. The matrix ensures these are directed toward the most impactful tasks, like Big Bets that align with long-term goals or Quick Wins that yield immediate benefits. By understanding where effort will produce the most value, teams can avoid resource-draining activities and maximize efficiency.Improves team alignment
Using the matrix fosters collaboration and transparency within teams. It provides a shared prioritization framework for evaluating and prioritizing tasks, ensuring that everyone — from developers to stakeholders — understands the reasoning behind decisions. This reduces conflicts and helps align the team on executing the product strategy.Balances short-term and long-term goals
The matrix helps teams balance quick, tactical wins with larger, strategic objectives. Quick Wins provide immediate progress and momentum, while Big Bets represent future growth opportunities. By visualizing these tasks together, the matrix ensures teams don’t overly focus on one at the expense of the other, maintaining a healthy workflow.Reduces wasted effort
By clearly identifying Money Pits, the matrix prevents teams from investing resources into low-impact, high-effort tasks. This benefit is crucial for avoiding burnout and frustration caused by working on tasks that yield little value, ensuring that every initiative contributes meaningfully to goals.Adaptable across teams and use cases
While particularly beneficial for product management, the matrix is versatile and can be applied to a wide range of scenarios, such as marketing campaigns, operational planning, and even personal productivity. Its universal applicability makes it a go-to framework for teams across industries.Encourages iteration and continuous improvement
The matrix thrives on regular updates, which makes it a good addition to sprint planning. Teams can revisit and re-evaluate tasks as priorities shift, new data emerges, or the business landscape changes. This encourages an iterative approach to decision-making, ensuring that priorities remain relevant and actionable.
When and why product teams should use the impact effort matrix
“As you grow, it comes down to ruthless prioritization. You have to say no to ten really good things to do two great things. It’s about figuring out what breaks through and understanding that we all have the same amount of time. ”
— Vinod Suresh, US CPO at GoDaddy, on The Product Podcast
The Impact Effort Matrix shines in real-world product management scenarios where teams need clarity, alignment, and efficiency. Here are four key situations where this tool can provide a collective relief:
1. Prioritizing feature requests from diverse stakeholders
Product teams often face competing demands. Sales pushes for customer-specific features, product marketing needs growth-driving enhancements, and engineering flags technical upgrades. Without clear prioritization, teams risk pleasing no one.
How the matrix helps:
Imagine a B2B SaaS company whose sales team demands a feature to close a key client, but marketing is pushing for a viral-sharing functionality. Using the Impact Effort Matrix, the team plots both features:
The client-specific feature is high effort and low impact (a Money Pit) since it’s unlikely to serve the broader user base.
The viral-sharing functionality is low effort and high impact (a Quick Win) as it drives organic growth and addresses the broader audience.
This clear visualization makes it easier to align the team on focusing resources where they matter most.
2. Tackling technical debt without stalling product development
Technical debt often builds up quietly, eventually adding to the cost of delay and impacting performance and scaling. Teams struggle to decide how much time to dedicate to fixing it versus delivering new features.
Impact Effort Matrix example:
Take an example where the engineering team suggests rewriting an old service. Using the matrix, the team evaluates:
Effort: Rewriting will take 4 months and significant resources.
Impact: While valuable, it doesn’t improve immediate customer satisfaction or revenue.
Instead of tackling the entire rewrite (a Big Bet), they isolate smaller fixes (like improving API efficiency) that rank as Quick Wins — improving scalability incrementally while maintaining product momentum.
3. Streamlining backlogs with bloated feature ideas
Product backlogs often accumulate features that are outdated, impractical, or overly ambitious. Without a structured framework, these ideas can create confusion and inertia.
How the matrix helps:
For example, a team at an e-commerce company evaluates 15 backlog features, including:
A chatbot feature requiring months of development with unclear benefits (a Money Pit).
Adding product bundles at checkout, which needs minimal coding but can drive higher cart value (a Quick Win).
The matrix enables them to clean up their backlog, prioritize revenue-driving enhancements, and eliminate tasks with no clear ROI.
4. Aligning product and cross-functional teams
Different departments often prioritize tasks based on their own goals which leads to misalignment. For example, marketing might want a feature that simplifies lead capture, while customer success pushes for something that reduces support tickets.
Impact Effort Matrix example:
At a SaaS company, both teams bring conflicting priorities to the product manager. By plotting their suggestions:
The lead capture feature is a high effort but offers moderate impact (a Big Bet).
An in-app support FAQ is low-effort and has a high impact, reducing ticket volume and improving user experience (Quick Win).
The matrix helps the product team explain decisions objectively and align everyone on the best use of resources.
5. Responding to competitive pressure
Competitors often release features that put pressure on teams to react. The risk is overcommitting resources to a rushed response.
Example of Impact Effort Analysis:
Consider a fintech app whose competitor launches instant payments. The product team evaluates:
Developing instant payments is a high effort but provides high impact (a Big Bet).
Improving transaction notifications is low effort and moderately impactful, keeping customers informed while instant payments are planned (Fill-In).
The matrix ensures the team doesn’t derail its roadmap but still addresses competitive gaps effectively.
How to Create and Implement an Impact Effort Matrix
The Impact Effort Matrix is simple in theory. However, implementing it effectively requires addressing real-world challenges within teams. Here’s how to create and integrate it into product management workflows.
Set clear objectives for its use
Before introducing the matrix, define the problems it aims to solve. Is it to streamline product prioritization, reduce conflicts between cross-functional teams, or focus resources on high-value tasks? Without clear objectives, the matrix risks being dismissed as another unnecessary tool.
Frame it as a solution to specific challenges, such as a backlog clogged with low-priority features or stakeholder conflicts over resource allocation.
Involve key stakeholders early
Resistance often stems from stakeholders not understanding how the matrix benefits their goals. To build buy-in, involve key team members — like product marketing, product design, sales, and engineering — early in the process. Collaboratively plot a few real features or tasks on the matrix to demonstrate its practical value.
When stakeholders see how the matrix does the trick, they’re more likely to adopt it.
Standardize definitions for impact and effort
One of the biggest pitfalls is inconsistent interpretation of impact and effort. Without clear criteria, plotting tasks on the matrix becomes subjective. This, without a doubt, leads to misalignment.
Define impact in terms of measurable outcomes, such as revenue growth, user satisfaction, or user retention improvements.
For effort, use a standardized scale based on time, complexity, or resources. For instance, a “high effort” task might require three months of engineering work, while a “low effort” task might be completed within a sprint. Document these definitions in a shared resource, like a team wiki, to ensure consistency.
Integrate the matrix into existing workflows
For the matrix to remain useful, it must become part of regular team processes. Incorporate it into sprint planning, quarterly roadmap reviews, or backlog grooming sessions. Begin these meetings by placing high-priority tasks on the matrix to guide discussions and decisions.
Make it a habit to revisit the matrix at the end of each sprint to evaluate progress and re-prioritize.
Use visual tools to improve accessibility
The more accessible and engaging the matrix, the more likely teams are to use it. Digital tools, like some Proddy-awarded tools or contemporary product management tools, allow teams to collaborate on the matrix in real time, making it easier to update and share.
Keep the design simple and intuitive. For example, limit the number of items plotted at once to prevent clutter and ensure the quadrants remain easy to interpret. A clean, visually engaging matrix reinforces its utility and adoption.
Train teams to use the matrix effectively
Teams may not immediately understand how to use the matrix or see its value. Training sessions and practical exercises ensure that everyone feels confident applying it.
Run workshops where team members plot real tasks or features on the matrix. Make them discuss the reasoning behind their placement.
Share feature prioritization templates or cheat sheets with examples of tasks to smooth out the process.
Assign ownership to maintain consistency
Without a clear owner, the matrix risks falling out of use. Assign someone, such as the Product Manager, Product Owner, or Product Lead, to maintain the matrix and ensure it’s updated regularly.
This owner should also analyze the stakeholders to keep the matrix aligned with team goals and evolving priorities. For example, as new features are proposed or priorities shift, the owner updates the matrix and communicates changes to the team.
Why Every Product Team Needs Structured Decision Making
In product management, the point of every available prioritization framework is to bridge the gap between what could be done and what should be done. It needs to be easy enough to understand but practical enough to actually bring value. The point is to strip away the noise of endless ideas, conflicting demands, and overstuffed backlogs.
The true genius of this Impact Effort Matrix lies in its simplicity. It doesn’t require elaborate tools, endless meetings, or complex algorithms. It’s a visual, collaborative framework that anyone can grasp in minutes. And yet, its impact is profound: better alignment, reduced friction, and a renewed focus on value.
Resistance to new processes is natural, especially in teams accustomed to their way of working. But ask yourself this: how much time and energy does your team currently waste on debates, re-prioritization, and unproductive sprints? The matrix offers a way out of that cycle.
So, if your team is still ‘ad-hocking’ on gut instinct, now is the time to try this framework. Not because it’s a trendy tool but because it works. And once your team sees the results — less wasted effort, more meaningful impact — they’ll have more trust in practical applications of the next framework you need to embrace.
Enroll in Product School's Product Strategy Micro-Certification (PSC)™️
The difference between a good and a great product lies in your Product Strategy, answering vital questions like: Who's the product for? What benefits does it offer? How does it further company objectives?
Enroll for Free
Updated: February 3, 2025
