Updated: August 4, 2025- 14 min read
Nearly half of all products, about 41%, fail within their first two years, according to research from the PDM Association.
That stat alone might not surprise you. The harder question is why they fail. It’s rarely as simple as bad ideas or poor execution. Very often, it’s a misread of where the product actually stands and what it needs next.
And yet, fewer than 30% of product teams conduct regular product maturity assessments, based on findings from a Gartner study. That means most teams are navigating growth, scaling, and optimization without a map.
In this piece, we’ll walk through what a product maturity model is, why it matters, and how to use it to better understand your product’s current state and what to do about it.
Top Tier Consulting at Product School
Our experienced team brings real-world lessons learned at top companies, providing guidance, fractional leadership, and training to transform organizations.
Learn more
What Is Product Maturity?
Product maturity refers to how developed and established a product is in its lifecycle, both in the market and within the organization. It reflects how well the product meets customer needs, supports business goals, and operates with predictable performance across teams.
In practice, it helps product teams gauge whether their product is still emerging, actively growing, stabilizing, or is becoming an end-of-life product.
A mature product typically has:
A clear, validated value proposition
Strong product-market fit and consistent user growth
Predictable performance metrics
Scalable infrastructure and processes
Cross-functional alignment across product, engineering, and go-to-market teams
What Is a Product Maturity Model?
A product maturity model is a framework that helps product teams evaluate how developed their product is across multiple dimensions — like product-market fit, technical stability, product experience, and internal alignment.
It breaks maturity into clear levels or stages so product teams can identify where they are today and what they need to improve to move forward.
Why Is the Product Maturity Model Important?
Without it, you’re basically guessing.
Without a maturity model, it’s easy to fall into reactive decision-making. Teams often prioritize based on gut feeling, feature requests, or competitor moves. But what a product actually needs at the emerging stage is very different from what it needs at the scaling or mature stage. The maturity model helps prevent that mismatch.
Here’s why that matters:
It helps you prioritize the right things
If you’re in the early stage, speed and learning matter more than polish. If you're mature, reliability and efficiency become the name of the game. Without knowing your stage, you might focus on the wrong things. You don’t want to build a loyalty program when you're still trying to nail product-market fit.It aligns your team
Everyone’s pulling in different directions. Engineering wants to refactor, product design wants to revamp UX, marketing wants to launch three new campaigns. The model helps you zoom out and decide what actually makes sense for where the product is now.It protects you from premature scaling
Many products stumble because they try to scale before they’re ready — spending money on ads, hiring too fast, or launching features no one asked for. A maturity model acts as a reality check before you burn through time and budget.
In short, it keeps you honest. It forces you to work with the product you actually have, not the one you wish you had. And that’s where better decisions start.
Core components of a product management maturity model
Strategy
Is there a clear product vision and product strategy? And more importantly, do teams actually use it to guide decisions, or does it live in a slide deck?Customer insight
How often does customer feedback shape product prioritization? Mature organizations bake learning loops into their workflow, not just NPS surveys post-launch.Planning and roadmapping
Are product roadmaps outcome-driven or a backlog of stakeholder requests? Is prioritization structured, transparent, and tied to real goals?Execution process
Can teams deliver reliably, iterate quickly, and manage quality without burning out? Look at release cadence, bug rates, and handoff friction.Key metrics and measurementsDo product teams know what success looks like and measure it consistently? Vanity metrics and dashboards without decisions are red flags.
Cross-functional collaborationAre product management, engineering, product design, and GTM truly aligned or just attending the same meetings? Alignment should show up in output, not just invites.
People and roles
Are responsibilities clearly defined? Do PMs have the autonomy and support to lead, not just coordinate?Tools and systems
Do current tools enable focus and visibility, or are they a patchwork of hacks? Mature teams don’t just have tools, they use them well.
These components give you a 360° view of how your Agile product organization actually operates.
How to Run a Product Maturity Assessment in 5 Steps
Running a maturity assessment is like holding up a mirror to your product-led organization. Tells you what’s working, what’s missing, and where to focus next. Follow these five steps and you’ll turn a one-off audit into an action plan that actually moves the needle.
1. Define the finish line
Clarity on why you’re assessing (and what “good” looks like) keeps the exercise from dissolving into opinion wars.
Product leadership often jumps straight to frameworks without first agreeing on the problem they’re trying to solve. Instead, start by framing the outcome you care most about and how you’ll know you’ve improved. That grounding will shape every question you ask and every metric you collect.
Pin down the business driver
Are you trying to ship faster, reduce churn, tighten cross-team alignment, or all three? Pick one primary goal; everything else is a supporting act.Translate strategy into measurable targets
If “ship faster” is the goal, decide whether “lead time from commit to deploy under 24 hours” is the right yardstick or if a different metric (like escaped-defect rate) better reflects your reality.Layer in context and constraints
Small startup? You’ll tolerate more process gaps than a regulated enterprise will. Remote-first org? Communication practices carry extra weight. Bake these realities into your definition of “finish line” so product scoring isn’t blind to context.Secure stakeholder alignment early
Bring engineering, design, GTM, and finance into a 60-minute kickoff to validate the goal. When every function helps set the finish line, they’re far more likely to act on the findings.Triage must-have vs. nice-to-have scope
A five-squad SaaS team can usually assess within two weeks. A 40-team enterprise might need phased rollouts. Right-size now to avoid scope creep later.
2. Pick (or adapt) a framework
The framework you choose determines what you’ll uncover and what you might overlook.
Many product teams get stuck trying to find the “perfect” model, but that’s rarely the point. The real goal is to pick something structured enough to spark honest conversations, yet flexible enough to fit your team’s stage, scope, and reality.
Use AIPMM if you’re auditing the entire product org, from vision to cross-functional alignment
Try DPM³ if your team ships regularly and works in Agile or continuous delivery
Go with Productboard’s 5 levels if you’re scaling a SaaS product and need a shared definition of “product excellence.”
Build your own if none of the existing models reflect your specific friction points or structure
Limit to 3–5 dimensions at first—you want clarity, not a 100-question survey that goes ignored
Find all of these mentioned frameworks below this 5-step process.
3. Gather evidence, not opinions
A maturity assessment is only as strong as the data behind it. Too often, teams rely on perception rather than proof. This step is about collecting tangible evidence across your chosen dimensions so you can identify patterns, not just anecdotes.
Start by mapping what data already exists inside your org. You’ll be surprised how much is buried in tools, docs, and Slack threads. Then supplement that with targeted input to fill the gaps.
Audit existing artifacts
Review product roadmaps, OKRs, Jira tickets, retro notes, onboarding docs, user research, and incident reports. These often reveal the real ways of working versus what’s claimed in meetings.Run structured team surveys
Ask teams to rate specific statements (e.g., “We use customer insights in every planning cycle”) using a consistent scale. Focus on observable behaviors, not beliefs.Host 1:1 or small-group interviews
Use open-ended questions to uncover blind spots, contradictions, and local workarounds. Dig into how decisions get made, not just what the process chart says.Tag insights by dimension and role
Group findings by category (e.g., product strategy, execution, tooling) and by function. This helps you spot whether problems are systemic or team-specific.Look for alignment gaps
If leadership thinks maturity is high in an area, but frontline teams say otherwise, that disconnect matters as much as the score.
4. Score, discuss, reality-check
Start by assigning scores to each dimension using a consistent scale, often a 4- or 5-point rubric ranging from ad hoc to optimized. Be transparent about what each level looks like in practice. The goal isn’t perfection, it’s consistency.
Create a maturity heatmap
Visualize scores by dimension and team. This makes gaps, strengths, and contradictions easier to spot at a glance.Hold a live working session
Bring cross-functional stakeholders into the same (virtual) room. Review the scores together, debate discrepancies, and invite teams to explain their context.Push for specific examples
If someone rates their team’s discovery practice as “advanced,” ask what that looks like week to week. Real maturity is demonstrated, not declared.Align on what’s real vs. aspirational
It’s tempting to inflate scores, especially in high-visibility areas. Create space for product teams to be honest without fear of judgment or blame.Document not just the scores, but the why
Capture disagreements, blockers, and quick wins that surfaced during the discussion. These will feed directly into your next step.
5. Turn gaps into action
Start by reviewing the lowest-scoring areas and the most critical misalignments. Not every gap deserves immediate attention. Your job is to connect maturity gaps to product and business impact.
Prioritize based on risk and leverage
Fix what’s holding you back today, not what looks impressive on paper. A weak customer feedback loop might matter more than a messy roadmap template.Translate gaps into specific initiatives
“Improve product discovery” becomes “Pilot continuous discovery cadence with Squad A by Q3.” Tie each initiative to a clear behavior or system change.Assign owners, not committees
Give each initiative a clear DRI (directly responsible individual). Collective ownership is where follow-through goes to die.Set realistic timelines and checkpoints
Some fixes can be done in a sprint. Others take a quarter. Set milestones so progress can be tracked without turning this into a full-time job.Share progress and recalibrate
Treat the assessment as a living document. Come back to it in 6 or 12 months. Show teams what changed and what still needs attention.
The goal isn’t to become “fully mature.” It’s to make progress where it matters and build the muscle to keep doing that over time.
Product Maturity Assessment Frameworks and Tools
Product maturity assessment helps teams understand how developed their product is and where they need to focus next. Below are some of the most widely used frameworks and tools designed to evaluate product maturity from different angles.
1. AIPMM Product Management Maturity Model
The AIPMM Product Management Maturity Model is a structured framework developed by the Association of International Product Marketing & Management. It’s designed to help organizations assess and improve their product management capabilities across multiple dimensions — not just the product itself, but the team, processes, and product strategy behind it.
This model evaluates maturity across areas like:
Market research and customer insight
Roadmapping and planning
Key metrics and performance tracking
Each area is assessed on a scale ranging from ad hoc to optimized, giving teams a clear view of where they’re strong and where they need to level up. It's particularly useful for identifying gaps in team capability or process maturity, and it works well in both small startups and larger, complex product-led organizations.
The model is often used during org-wide product audits, leadership transitions, or when preparing for scale. It’s less about one product’s lifecycle and more about how your product function operates as a system.
Pros
Provides a structured, organization-wide view of product maturity
Covers both strategic and operational aspects of product management
Helps identify gaps across teams, tools, and decision-making processes
Useful for aligning leadership around long-term product capability building
Adaptable to different industries and team sizes
Cons
Can be too broad or high-level for teams focused on a single product
Requires time and cross-functional input to complete thoroughly
May feel more like a team audit than a product-specific assessment
Lacks lightweight tooling for quick self-assessment or tracking over time
2. Thoughtworks Digital Product Management Maturity Model (DPM³)
The Thoughtworks DPM³ model is a practical and comprehensive framework built specifically for digital product teams. It evaluates product maturity across six core dimensions that reflect the health and effectiveness of modern product practices:
User-centred decision making
Value-driven outcomes
Rapid and continuous delivery
Product growth mindset
Governance and risk management
Team collaboration and ways of working
Each dimension is broken down into detailed practices, and each practice is rated across four levels of maturity, from foundational to advanced. What makes this model stand out is its emphasis on regular self-assessment. Teams are encouraged to revisit the model every six months to track progress and identify areas for improvement.
DPM³ is ideal for teams working in Agile product management and looking to mature not just the product, but the way they build and scale it. It’s both strategic and operational, offering concrete direction on what to focus on next to drive product excellence.
Pros
Tailored specifically for digital product teams and modern workflows
Covers both mindset and practice across six well-defined dimensions
Encourages continuous improvement through regular self-assessments
Offers actionable insights tied to team behaviors and delivery patterns
Flexible enough to use across startups and enterprise teams
Cons
Requires honest team input, which can be subjective without facilitation
May need a dedicated session or workshop to apply effectively
Some dimensions (like governance) may feel less relevant in early-stage teams
Not widely standardized, so comparisons across orgs may vary
3. Productboard’s Five Levels of Product Excellence Maturity
Productboard’s maturity model is designed to help product teams understand where they stand on the path to “product excellence” — a state where customer needs drive decision-making, and delivery aligns with strategy.
The model outlines five progressive levels of maturity, each building on the previous, and each tied to how well the team integrates product thinking into its daily operations.
The five levels are:
Unstructured – Product processes are ad hoc, customer feedback is scattered, and prioritization is reactive.
Emerging – Teams begin capturing insights and defining product goals but lack consistency and alignment.
Structured – Product decisions are increasingly driven by customer input, and workflows become repeatable.
Integrated – Customer-centricity is embedded across the org, and product strategy informs execution.
Excellent – Teams operate with full alignment, proactive product discovery, strategic prioritization, and measurable product impact.
The framework focuses on dimensions like customer-centricity, product strategy, cross-functional collaboration, and delivery alignment. It's particularly useful for SaaS teams looking to benchmark their internal practices and move from reactive execution to intentional, strategy-led product development.
Pros
Provides a clear, staged path toward product excellence
Helps teams align product decisions with customer needs and company strategy
Accessible and easy to communicate across product and executive stakeholders
Encourages stronger PM–design–engineering collaboration through shared criteria
Cons
Optimized for SaaS and digital product orgs, less relevant for physical product or services teams
Emphasis on internal workflows may overlook broader market dynamics
The framework is high-level and may need tailoring to match org-specific language or structure
Doesn’t provide deep technical or process audits, focuses more on team behavior and mindset
Use Product Maturity Assessment to Guide Your Next Move
Product maturity assessment isn’t just a box to check. It’s a tool that helps teams build smarter, scale more intentionally, and avoid costly missteps.
Whether you’re launching a new product or managing one that’s already mature, knowing where it stands in its life and how your team is operating around it makes all the difference. The right framework doesn’t just show you what’s working. It shows you what’s missing, what’s next, and what to stop doing.
Enroll in Product School's Product Strategy Micro-Certification (PSC)™️
The difference between a good and a great product lies in your Product Strategy, answering vital questions like: Who's the product for? What benefits does it offer? How does it further company objectives?
Enroll for Free
Updated: August 4, 2025
